Overview
Strategy session between Mark Hope and attorney Sam Wayne (Wayne Law SC) on managing the ownership dispute with former business partner Egan. The meeting covered three interlocking moves: (1) reclassifying a January loan as a capital contribution to establish Mark's majority ownership, (2) calling a formal member meeting to ratify Egan's termination and vote to deny further capital contributions, and (3) monitoring for legal action from Egan's side while preparing for potential arbitration or mediation.
Attendees:
- Mark Hope (mark.hope@asymmetric.pro) — Asymmetric
- Atty. Sam Wayne (samwayne@waynelawsc.com) — Wayne Law SC [external counsel]
Key Decisions
1. Reclassify January Loan as Capital Contribution
The $5,000 loan booked in January will be reclassified as a capital contribution, shifting Mark's ownership percentage above 50%. Key rationale:
- The operating agreement contains no explicit prohibition on unilateral capital contributions by a member.
- The statute (Ch. 183) and operating agreement both implicitly recognize that members may make capital contributions beyond initial funding, as ownership percentage is defined as a function of capital accounts.
- The AI analysis of the operating agreement confirmed: "There is no sentence that literally says you need consent to change ownership."
- Sam acknowledged the reclassification occurring post-termination is imperfect and could appear manipulative, but concluded it still adds a hurdle for Egan and costs Mark essentially nothing.
Decision: Proceed with reclassification. Mark to confirm the exact date and amount of the January transaction. Sam to draft a letter on Asymmetric letterhead from Mark to himself acknowledging the capital contribution and stating the new ownership percentage.
2. Member Meeting Agenda
Two agenda items only:
1. Vote to deny further capital contributions — prevents Egan from matching Mark's contribution and reclaiming 50/50 split. Requires only a majority vote under the operating agreement.
2. Vote to ratify Egan's termination — formalizes the termination already executed. Strong factual record supports this: Egan cleared his office, stopped working (empty calendar for August–September), returned his key via his father, and has not disputed the termination in writing.
Decision: Schedule meeting for Tuesday at 9am at Sam's office, approximately two weeks out. Notice to go out this week.
3. Capital Contribution Letter Precedes Meeting; Egan Not Notified Until Meeting
The letter acknowledging Mark's majority ownership will be prepared and held internally. Egan will not be informed of the ownership change until the meeting itself — at which point the vote to deny further contributions will already be on the agenda, preventing him from matching before the vote locks it in.
Legal Considerations
| Issue | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Authority to make unilateral capital contribution | Permissible — not prohibited by operating agreement or Ch. 183 statute |
| Authority to call member meeting | Any member may call a meeting per operating agreement (p. 3) |
| Meeting notice requirements | No statutory notice period for LLCs (unlike corporations); Sam recommends at least one week from receipt |
| Egan postponing meeting indefinitely | Possible but constitutes bad faith; Sam will frame notice to require good-faith response within two weeks |
| Injunction risk | No formal time limit, but courts require showing of immediate/irreparable harm — Egan's three-week silence weakens any urgency argument |
| Statute of limitations | 6 years on breach of contract claims |
| Mediator's likely focus | Buyout negotiation, not scrutiny of termination process; mediator will likely ask "what else was Mark supposed to do?" |
| Fiduciary duty risk (future) | Distributions must remain pro-rata; performance bonuses paid as ownership interest are a viable long-term dilution strategy if justified by market-rate CEO compensation |
Action Items
- [ ] Mark — Confirm exact date and dollar amount of January transaction for reclassification
- [ ] Sam Wayne — Draft meeting notice letter (proposed date: Tuesday 9am, ~2 weeks out; location: Sam's office; agenda: vote on capital contributions, ratify termination); send to Mark for review
- [ ] Sam Wayne — After Mark's approval, email meeting notice to Egan; cc Mark
- [ ] Sam Wayne — Draft letter on Asymmetric letterhead (Mark to himself) acknowledging capital contribution reclassification and stating new ownership percentage
Egan's Current Status
- No contact from Egan or any attorney since termination (~3 weeks prior to this meeting).
- Mark provided Sam's contact details to Egan in the final buyout termination email; standard practice would be for opposing counsel to make contact — none has.
- LinkedIn signal: A partner at Husch Blackwell (Jake Harris, commercial litigation) viewed Mark's profile ~4 days before this meeting; Egan viewed it ~6 days prior. Sam noted Jake Harris was involved in a significant trust collection error in another matter. Mark noted it may be coincidental (Asymmetric also operates a licensed PI agency that does work for law firms).
- Physical encounter: Mark saw Egan crossing the street near Edgewood High School; received a "glaring look." No verbal contact.
- Theories on silence: (a) Egan has given up; (b) Egan is waiting to collect distributions passively; (c) Egan/counsel is planning a filing. Sam assessed Egan's best legal outcome is likely acknowledgment of economic interest rights, not reinstatement — making early mediation toward a buyout the rational move for Egan's side.
Background Context
- Mark made two buyout offers to Egan: $360,000 over 3 years (declined — Egan demanded personal guarantees), then $300,000 with a deadline (deadline passed; Mark declared it final).
- Egan's prior counsel was referred to as "her" — possibly a friend at Ascendium (Jenny Kruger, Deputy General Counsel) advising informally.
- Mark contributed capital to Asymmetric six times over the past ~18 months, each time asking Egan to match; Egan declined each time citing inability to contribute.
- Egan cleared his office, stopped attending work, and returned his key — Sam characterized this as a constructive resignation regardless of how the termination is labeled.
Relevant Transcript Excerpts
Sam Wayne: "I don't see anything in here or in the statute that would prohibit a capital contribution by you or by Egan, but there, with your majority ownership, you can... make decisions as majority owner... but it has to be done at a meeting. And so at the meeting, we'll have you vote to deny any further capital contributions."
Sam Wayne: "Clearing his office out is probably the best fact that we have for this."
Sam Wayne: "I think any mediator, yes, if we end up going to mediation, the goal is going to be to get a buyout sorted, not to second guess the steps that you took in terminating his employment."
Sam Wayne: "There's no formal time limit for an injunction. There are statutes of limitations on claims. Breach of contract is six years. That said, a court will look at any injunction filing with common sense... if you wait months to file that, the court's going to say, what do you mean there's immediate harm?"
Related
- [1]