wiki/knowledge/google-ads/bluepoint-pmax-geofencing-strategy.md Layer 2 article 699 words Updated: 2026-04-05
↓ MD ↓ PDF
google-ads pmax geofencing bluepointatm paid-ads

BluePoint ATM — Google Ads PMAX & Geofencing Strategy

Overview

During the December 2025 monthly marketing sync, BluePoint ATM and the Asymmetric team reviewed the current Google Ads setup and surfaced a strategic question: should ad spend be concentrated in a handful of high-ROI states rather than running a broad national campaign? This article captures the current campaign structure, the geofencing implementation, and the open strategic question for follow-up.

Related client: [1]
Source meeting: [2]


Current Campaign Structure

BluePoint ATM runs multiple Google Ads campaign types managed under the Asymmetric Marketing (AM) umbrella account:

Campaign Status Notes
Reverse ATM — Search Active Keyword-targeted; geofencing enabled for specific states
PMAX Active AI-driven; runs across all Google channels
Traditional ATM Paused Paused prior to December call
Cashless Paused Paused prior to December call
LinkedIn Paused Paused at December call for Oct–Nov performance review

LinkedIn and Meta campaigns were paused at the December call to allow a full October–November performance review before setting the 2026 budget. Google Ads (Search + PMAX) were explicitly kept running.


What Is PMAX?

Performance Max (PMAX) is a Google Ads campaign type that uses AI to automate ad delivery across all Google channels simultaneously:

Rather than manually pairing keywords to ad copy, PMAX ingests creative assets and signals, then optimizes placement and bidding automatically. In BluePoint's account, PMAX has historically been the top-performing campaign type. Mark (Asymmetric) has noted the Google Ads overall are performing well and cautioned against over-tinkering.


Geofencing Implementation

Geofencing has been enabled on the active campaigns, targeting specific states where BluePoint ATM operates or has high business potential. The location pins were confirmed live in the Google Ads interface during the December call.

Current limitation: Within a geofenced campaign, spend is distributed roughly equally across the targeted geography. To weight spend toward a specific state or metro, a separate, state-specific campaign would need to be created.


Open Strategic Question: Concentrated vs. Broad Targeting

Wade raised a hypothetical during the call that surfaced a real strategic decision:

"Would it make sense to ignore 49 states and outbid everybody else for AdWords in Texas, since that's where we're going to get the highest rate of return per click?"

The broader version of the question: Is it better to run a national campaign across all viable states, or concentrate budget in 4–8 high-ROI states?

Arguments for concentration

Arguments for broad reach

Current guidance

Melissa committed to researching this question with Gilbert (Google Ads specialist) and Mark before making a recommendation. The team agreed to let the current geofencing setup run for approximately one month to gather data before deciding.


Action Items

Owner Action Status
Melissa Research concentrated state targeting vs. broad national strategy; consult Gilbert and Mark Open
Melissa Schedule "Digital Performance Review" (Mon or Thurs, next week) to review Oct–Nov Google Ads performance Open
Asymmetric team Keep Reverse ATM Search + PMAX active; keep Traditional and Cashless paused In progress