wiki/knowledge/lead-generation/adava-care-90-day-proof-plan.md Layer 2 article 837 words Updated: 2026-04-05
↓ MD ↓ PDF
lead-generation ppc budget-justification davacare senior-living proof-of-concept cac ltv

DavaCare 90-Day Proof-of-Concept Plan

Overview

When a client is unwilling or unable to commit to the recommended marketing budget, a 90-day proof-of-concept plan bridges the gap. Rather than asking for more money upfront, you demonstrate ROI within the existing budget by fixing allocation problems — then use the results to justify a larger investment.

This plan was developed for DavaCare, a multi-location senior memory care provider, using the [1]. DavaCare was spending ~$3,000/month on Google Ads against a recommended budget of $20,000/month for a projected 17x ROI.

The core insight: the problem isn't the budget — it's how the budget is being spent.


Business Economics (DavaCare)

Understanding the unit economics is essential before pitching any budget conversation.

Metric Value
Monthly rate per resident ~$5,000
Average length of stay ~3 years
Customer LTV ~$180,000
Allowable CAC ~$7,000
Monthly vacancy cost (30 beds) ~$165,000
Total revenue sitting empty ~$4.2M

At $3,500/month in retainer fees, a single new move-in generates roughly 3x the agency's annual fee. This framing is essential for client conversations about budget.


The 90-Day Plan

Objective

Use the current $3,000/month Google Ads budget to prove the lead generation model works — without asking for additional spend.

Current Baseline (at $3k/month)

Month 1: Fix What's Broken

Month 2: Optimize and Expand

Month 3: Prove the Model

90-Day Success Metrics

Metric Baseline Target
Monthly leads ~21 ~30
Cost per lead ~$100 ~$85
Lead volume increase +43%
CPL reduction -22%
Conversion rate ~5.4% 7%+

Hitting these numbers proves: leads exist, the funnel converts, and more budget equals more move-ins.


The Budget Increase Pitch (Post-90 Days)

After demonstrating results, present the ROI case for scaling:

"With $3,000/month, we increased leads by 43% and cut cost per lead by 22%. We're now generating 30 leads/month at $85 each. At $8,000/month, we project 80 leads/month. At a 10% close rate, that's 8 move-ins/month — $1.1M in new LTV per month of marketing. The math: spend $8,000 to generate $1M+."

What the Client Loses by Staying at $3k/Month

Be explicit about trade-offs:

Framing the Choice

"We can make this work within $3,000, but let's be clear: we're running a proof of concept, not a full lead generation program. In 90 days, I'll show you data that proves this works. At that point, we'll need to decide: stay small and fill maybe 10–15 beds over the year, or invest properly and fill all 30."


Scaling Path

Clients rarely jump from $3k to $20k. Expect a gradual ramp:

  1. Day 1–90: $3,000/month proof-of-concept
  2. Month 4: Present results; propose doubling to $6,000
  3. Month 7–9: Scale to $10,000–$15,000 based on demonstrated returns
  4. Month 12+: Full $20,000/month program if beds remain unfilled or waitlist is the goal

Note: once beds are full and a waitlist exists, the allowable CAC changes — a 3-deep waitlist makes a 4th position worth very little. Revisit budget ceilings as occupancy improves.


Data Needed to Refine the Model

To sharpen projections, collect from the client:

See [2] for account context.