wiki/knowledge/website/cureline-website-rebuild-proposal.md Layer 2 article 920 words Updated: 2026-04-05
↓ MD ↓ PDF
website seo cureline proposal-pending conversion-optimization website-rebuild biotech

Cureline Website Rebuild & Optimization

Overview

During a complimentary strategy session with Jack Wilson (Cureline), Asymmetric identified Cureline's website as a critical liability and primary growth bottleneck. A website rebuild — rather than incremental optimization — emerged as the preferred path to give Cureline full control over its web presence, properly surface its service offerings (particularly histopathology), and build a foundation for SEO and lead conversion.

A formal proposal covering scope, deliverables, timeline, and cost is pending delivery to Jack Wilson for internal review and CEO sign-off ahead of Q1 planning.

See also: [1] | [2]


Current State: Diagnosed Problems

Asymmetric's pre-call research surfaced the following website performance issues:

Metric Current State Implication
Monthly traffic ~49 visits/month Effectively invisible to buyers
Organic keywords 36 total, 0 commercial intent Not ranking for anything that drives revenue
Homepage traffic share 87% Poor internal linking; service pages not discoverable
Domain rank 35 Weak for a 22-year-old company, but workable
Backlinks ~1,000 Existing authority to build on
Conversion design None Site describes services but does not capture leads

"Your website gets 49 visits a month, and for a 22-year-old business, that's not very good." — Mark Hope

The site currently ranks for informational and navigational keywords with no commercial or transactional intent — meaning buyers actively searching for biospecimen or histopathology services are not finding Cureline.


Root Cause: Outsourced, Slow-to-Update Management

Cureline's website is managed by an external programming vendor (details held by colleague Harminder). This creates:

"Whenever I personally want website changes, it's not like we have a programmer in-house that I can just call up and say, hey, make this change." — Jack Wilson


Proposed Solution: Full Website Rebuild

Rationale for Rebuild Over Optimization

While SEO and CRO improvements can be layered onto the existing site, a full rebuild is the recommended path because:

  1. Full control — Cureline would own and manage the site directly, eliminating vendor dependency
  2. Service-page architecture — rebuild allows proper structuring of service pages (e.g., histopathology, oncology biospecimens, Baltic facility) so traffic lands on relevant pages rather than the homepage
  3. SEO-first foundation — new site can be built with commercial-intent keyword targeting baked in from the start
  4. Conversion design — pages can be built to capture leads, not just describe services
  5. Integration of differentiators — asymmetric positioning (woman-owned, NIH credentials, founder-led, boutique scale) can be woven into the site architecture and copy

"Another idea would be just to rebuild it. You can rebuild the whole thing and then have complete control and be able to make changes and do all that." — Mark Hope

"I mainly focus on the histopathology side of the business, and I feel like our website is not geared towards that at all. I have a lot of things I want to do differently with our website." — Jack Wilson


Scope (Proposal Pending)

The SEO & website proposal to be delivered will cover:

Staffing for the SEO/website engagement would include an account manager plus one or two implementation specialists (developer, content).


Success Criteria

Jack articulated the following targets for the engagement overall:

These targets apply to the broader lead-gen effort but the website rebuild is the foundational enabler.


Internal Context & Constraints


Action Items