---
title: Google Ads Optimization Demo — Cordwainer Account (2026-03-18)
type: article
created: '2026-03-18'
updated: '2026-04-05'
source_docs:
- raw/2026-03-18-weekly-call-inventory-performance-marketing-130927254.md
tags:
- google-ads
- cordwainer
- ai-tools
- performance-marketing
- remarketing
- conversion-tracking
- negative-keywords
- bidding-strategy
layer: 2
client_source: The Cordwainer
industry_context: senior-living
transferable: false
---

# Google Ads Optimization Demo — Cordwainer Account (2026-03-18)

## Overview

During the [[wiki/meetings/2026-03-18-weekly-call-inventory-performance-marketing|2026-03-18 weekly call]], Mark demoed a new AI agent that performed a live audit of the [[wiki/clients/current/cordwainer/_index|Cordwainer]] Google Ads account. The agent identified several critical structural errors and executed fixes in real time — work that would typically take hours of manual review. The session surfaced a pattern of misconfigured accounts that likely applies across multiple clients.

---

## Audit Findings

### 1. Bidding Strategy — Critical

The account was running **Target ROAS** on a lead-generation account with **zero conversion values assigned**. This made the bidding algorithm effectively blind: Google had no signal to optimize toward and was unable to bid competitively.

> "You can't have a $1 value per conversion and then optimize for conversions because Google's going to say, oh, these are only worth a dollar, so I'm only willing to pay 10 cents for them." — Mark

**Fix applied:** Switched all campaigns to **Maximize Conversions**.

---

### 2. Conversion Tracking — Critical

All **eight conversion actions** in the account were marked as **Primary**. Google's algorithm cannot determine what to optimize for when every action carries equal weight.

**Recommended structure:**
- **Primary (2–3 actions):** High-intent actions only — e.g., form submission, phone call, meeting booking
- **Secondary (all others):** Page views, scroll depth, soft engagement signals

**Remaining blocker:** Six legacy **Smart Campaign** conversions are locked as Primary by Google and cannot be changed via the API or UI. This is a known Google limitation with no current workaround.

---

### 3. Negative Keywords — High Priority

No negative keywords were active on the main campaigns. This allowed budget to be consumed by irrelevant search terms.

**Fix applied:** Added:
- 16 competitor brand terms as negative keywords
- 5 Cordwainer brand terms as negatives on non-brand campaigns (to prevent cannibalization)

---

### 4. Landing Pages — Medium Priority

Quality scores were poor, attributed to sending all ad traffic to the **generic homepage** rather than intent-matched landing pages.

**Fix applied (partial):** A dedicated landing page has been requested but not yet built.

**Action:** [[wiki/clients/current/cordwainer/_index|Karly]] to task Sebastian with creating a dedicated landing page for Cordwainer. See [[#open-action-items]].

---

### 5. Brand Campaign — Missing

No dedicated brand campaign existed, meaning Cordwainer was not protecting its own branded search terms.

**Fix applied:** Created a new **exact-match brand campaign**.

---

### 6. Remarketing — Not Configured

No remarketing audiences were attached to any campaigns.

**Fix applied:** Created remarketing audiences and attached them to all campaigns.

**Current blocker:** Audiences are newly created and need time to populate before ads can serve. Display creative is also needed.

**Action:** Design team to create display images for the remarketing campaign.

---

### 7. Conversion Values — Not Assigned

No monetary values were assigned to conversion actions, preventing value-based bidding from functioning correctly.

**Fix applied:** Assigned estimated values to key actions. Example:
- Form Submit → **$100**

**Note on methodology:** For lead-gen accounts, conversion value should reflect estimated lead value, not revenue. A rough formula:

```
Lead Value = (Average Deal Size × Close Rate) × Gross Margin
```

For Cordwainer specifically, a client relationship is estimated at ~$6,000–$7,000/month. At a 10% close rate, a lead is worth ~$7,200 annually — far above the $1 placeholder that was previously in the account.

---

### 8. Broken Sitelink

One sitelink was pointing to a **404 page**.

**Fix applied:** Corrected the broken URL.

---

## Budget Allocation

The AI agent optimized the Google Ads budget to approximately **$1,490/month**, calibrated against Cordwainer's total digital ad spend of **$2,000/month** (Google + Meta combined).

**Action:** Karly to confirm exact Meta spend with Sebastian to validate this split.

---

## Remaining Issues & Open Blockers

| Issue | Status | Blocker |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Campaign conversions locked as Primary | ⚠️ Unresolved | Google API limitation — cannot be changed |
| Remarketing audiences need to populate | ⏳ In progress | Needs ~2–4 weeks of traffic |
| Display creative for remarketing | ⏳ Pending | Design team task |
| Dedicated landing page | ⏳ Pending | Sebastian to build |
| Call tracking | ⏳ Pending | Karly researching solutions |
| Homepage campaign performance | 👀 Monitoring | Pause if no improvement in 2–3 weeks |

---

## Open Action Items

- [ ] **Gilbert** — Monitor Cordwainer remarketing audience growth; launch remarketing ads when lists are large enough
- [ ] **Gilbert** — Monitor Maximize Conversions performance for 2–3 weeks; pause homepage campaign if performance doesn't improve
- [ ] **Karly** — Confirm exact Meta ad spend with Sebastian to validate the $1,490/month Google budget split
- [ ] **Karly** — Task Sebastian with creating a dedicated landing page for Cordwainer
- [ ] **Karly** — Task design team with creating display images for the remarketing campaign
- [ ] **Karly** — Research and implement call tracking solution for Cordwainer
- [ ] **Gilbert** — Schedule setup call with Mark to install and configure the Google Ads AI audit agent locally

---

## Broader Implications

The issues found in the Cordwainer account — misconfigured bidding, over-assigned primary conversions, missing negative keywords — are consistent with patterns Mark identified across other client accounts during recent audits (e.g., Reynolds Transfer). These are systemic risks worth auditing across the full client portfolio.

**Related:** Mark to run Q2 OKR audits for all clients, which will include a Google Ads structural review.

See also: [[wiki/knowledge/google-ads/conversion-value-methodology|Conversion Value Methodology for Lead-Gen Accounts]] · [[wiki/knowledge/google-ads/bidding-strategy-guide|Bidding Strategy Guide]]