---
title: BluePoint ATM — LinkedIn & Meta Ad Pause (Oct–Nov 2025)
type: article
created: '2026-04-05'
updated: '2026-04-05'
source_docs:
- raw/2025-12-03-bluepoint-atm-marketing-call-106061405.md
tags:
- paid-social
- linkedin
- meta
- google-ads
- bluepointatm
- budget-planning
- performance-review
layer: 2
client_source: null
industry_context: null
transferable: true
---

# BluePoint ATM — LinkedIn & Meta Ad Pause (Oct–Nov 2025)

## Overview

At the December 2025 monthly marketing sync, BluePoint ATM and Asymmetric agreed to pause LinkedIn and Meta paid social campaigns in order to conduct a structured review of October–November performance before committing to a 2026 budget. Google Ads campaigns were left partially running, with the reverse ATM campaign continuing under geofenced state targeting.

This decision reflects a broader pattern: pausing spend at a natural calendar boundary to let data accumulate before re-optimizing, rather than making mid-flight adjustments without a full picture.

## Decision

**Pause LinkedIn and Meta campaigns** pending a dedicated "Digital Performance Review" covering October–November activity.

Key factors driving the decision:
- November had just closed, making it a natural evaluation point.
- Wade needed consolidated performance data to plan the 2026 marketing budget.
- The team lacked a clear read on which channels were generating meaningful ROI.
- Meta was already effectively inactive ("we're not doing Meta" per Melissa); the formal pause applied primarily to **LinkedIn**.

## What Stayed Running

Not everything was paused. The following Google Ads campaigns were kept active:

| Campaign | Status |
|---|---|
| Reverse ATM (Search + PMAX) | ✅ Continued, with geofencing on targeted states |
| Traditional ATM | ⏸ Already paused prior to this call |
| Cashless ATM | ⏸ Already paused prior to this call |
| LinkedIn | ⏸ Paused per this decision |
| Meta | ⏸ Inactive / confirmed paused |

**PMAX** (Performance Max) was explicitly kept on. Melissa noted it typically outperforms other campaign types because it uses Google's AI to serve ads across Search, Display, YouTube, Gmail, and Maps simultaneously, pulling from the highest-performing signals automatically.

## Geofencing & State Targeting Question

Separately, Wade raised a strategic question: rather than running a broad national Google Ads campaign, would it make more sense to concentrate spend in a small number of high-ROI states (e.g., Texas) where BluePoint ATM has the strongest business case?

Melissa noted that hyper-narrowing to a single state is typically only warranted for event-specific or single-market businesses, and that the current campaigns were performing well per Mark's assessment. However, she agreed to research whether concentrating on 4–8 states (rather than 50) would improve efficiency — particularly given that markets like Hawaii or Alaska are impractical for reverse ATM deployment.

> **Open question:** Does concentrating Google Ads spend in fewer, higher-ROI states outperform a broad national campaign for BluePoint ATM's business model?

## Scheduled Follow-Up

A dedicated **Digital Performance Review** was to be scheduled for the following week (Monday or Thursday) to cover:
- October and November performance across all active channels
- LinkedIn campaign results prior to pause
- Google Ads (Search + PMAX) performance
- Budget recommendations for 2026

## Action Items

| Owner | Action |
|---|---|
| Melissa | Pause LinkedIn campaigns |
| Melissa | Schedule "Digital Performance Review" for Mon or Thurs the following week |
| Melissa | Research concentrated state targeting strategy for Google Ads |
| Melissa | Consult Gilbert and Mark on state-focused bidding approach |

## Related

- [[clients/bluepointatm/_index]] — BluePoint ATM client overview
- [[knowledge/paid-search/bluepoint-google-ads-geofencing]] — Geofencing and PMAX campaign details
- [[knowledge/crm/bluepoint-hubspot-lead-sync-failure]] — Concurrent HubSpot issue discussed in the same call