wiki/knowledge/google-ads/skaalen-q1-okr-ads-optimization.md · 673 words · 2026-04-05
Skaalen Q1 OKR — Google Ads Optimization
Overview
As part of the Q1 OKR planning session in the [1] March 2026 monthly marketing call, the team proposed a structured Google Ads optimization objective. The initiative responds to a 40% drop in February ad impressions (to ~4,000) and a persistent over-reliance on branded search terms driving the majority of clicks. Despite the impression dip, a 9% CTR was noted as strong — the goal is to extend that performance into non-branded territory.
This objective sits alongside [2] and [3] as part of the broader Q1 initiative set.
Context: February Performance
- Impressions: ~4,000 — down 40% month-over-month
- CTR: 9% — strong across all campaigns combined
- Branded campaigns (e.g., "Skaalen," "Skaalen Retirement," "Skaalen Heights") drive the majority of clicks
- Competitor campaigns yield low results despite testing multiple local community names around Stoughton
- Likely causes for impression drop: seasonal factors (snowbirds away in February), Valentine's Day holiday reducing search intent, shorter month
Melissa flagged the impression drop as worth investigating year-over-year to determine if this is a recurring seasonal pattern rather than a structural problem.
Objective: Optimize Google Ads
Goal: Improve the efficiency and reach of Google Ads campaigns by auditing current performance, expanding into non-branded campaigns, and closing content gaps that suppress CTR.
Key Results
1. Conduct a Full Google Ads Audit
- A comprehensive audit was already in progress at the time of the meeting, with results expected by end of day
- The audit will surface recommendations based on adjustments made in prior months and identify underperforming ad groups
- Particular focus: the competitor campaign group, which consistently underperforms relative to investment
2. Implement A/B Testing on Non-Branded Campaigns
- Build new non-branded ad groups targeting terms like "assisted living in Stoughton" and "senior living Wisconsin"
- Test messaging variations emphasizing Skaalen's continuum of care and 125-year heritage as differentiators
- Non-branded campaigns tie directly into the SEO objective — keywords targeted in ads should align with on-page content being refreshed
3. Fix High-Impression, Low-CTR Content Gaps
- Use Google Search Console data to identify terms with high impression volume but poor click-through
- Example from February: "memory care community" — high impressions, low clicks — suggesting the landing experience or ad copy isn't converting searchers
- Coordinate with the meta title/description refresh (part of the SEO OKR) to ensure ad destinations match search intent
Current Campaign Structure (as of February 2026)
| Ad Group |
Performance Notes |
| Branded (Skaalen) |
Highest clicks; 366 clicks in Feb; strong CTR |
| Assisted Living |
Performing well |
| Senior Living |
Performing well |
| Competitor |
Low yield; difficult to convert despite local community targeting |
Strategic Notes
- Branded dominance is a double-edged signal. High branded CTR confirms strong name recognition in the market, but it means ads are largely serving people who already know Skaalen — not capturing new-to-market prospects.
- Competitor campaigns are a known challenge. This is consistent with patterns seen across other clients — competitor keyword campaigns rarely deliver the expected yield. Consider whether budget allocated here would perform better in non-branded category terms.
- Seasonal impression dips may be normal. Before making structural changes based on the February drop, Melissa committed to pulling year-over-year data to confirm whether February consistently underperforms.
Action Items
| Owner |
Action |
| Melissa |
Deliver Google Ads audit findings to Dawn and Chris |
| Melissa |
Investigate February impression drop year-over-year |
| Melissa / Sebastian |
Build non-branded campaign ad groups with A/B test variants |
| Melissa |
Coordinate content gap fixes with meta refresh (SEO OKR) |