Performance snapshot from the October 2025 monthly marketing call. Metrics cover the 30-day period ending early October 2025.
Citrus America runs three Google Ads campaigns managed by Asymmetric: a Commercial Juicer search campaign, a Citro Casa branded search campaign, and a Remarketing display campaign. A fourth Competitor campaign was paused at the time of this review. All active campaigns carried a 100% optimization score.
Total spend over the 30-day period was approximately $1,200, against a combined daily budget of $60/day (~$1,800/month potential). Actual daily spend averaged $40/day, meaning the budget ceiling was not being hit despite Google flagging campaigns as "limited by budget."
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Impressions | ~900 |
| Clicks | ~100 |
| CTR | 12.65% |
| Avg. CPC | ~$2.68 |
| Spend | ~$300 |
| Impression share lost (budget) | 87% |
| Impression share lost (rank) | 5% |
Notes: A CTR above 6% is considered exceptional; 12.65% is nearly double the agency benchmark across 40+ clients. The high impression share lost to budget (87%) suggests this campaign could absorb more spend efficiently if budget becomes available. Average CPC is elevated relative to consumer campaigns, which is typical for B2B commercial search terms due to auction competition.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Impressions | ~226 |
| Clicks | ~27 |
| CTR | ~12% |
| Spend | ~$300 |
| Daily budget | $16/day |
Notes: Low competition on the branded term keeps CPCs low. Spend came in under the $480/month budget ceiling (~$300 actual). Conversion volume was limited.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Impressions | ~278,000 |
| Clicks | ~2,200 |
| Interaction rate | 0.5% |
| Avg. CPC | $0.41 |
| Spend | ~$900 |
| Conversions | 8 |
| Cost per conversion | ~$0.40 |
Notes: Interaction rate of 0.5% is above average for display retargeting. CPCs are very low. This campaign targets prior website visitors across the Google Display Network (e.g., weather.com). Conversion volume is modest but cost-efficient.
Status: Paused. Expected to be reactivated once the ZoomX and ZoomO competitor landing pages are updated. The hypothesis is that a better-matched landing page will improve Quality Score and conversion rate, making the campaign more efficient. See [1] for landing page revision details.
While not a paid channel, the October review also surfaced encouraging AI citation data:
This signals growing organic authority in AI-generated search results, which may reduce reliance on paid traffic over time.