wiki/knowledge/salesforce/papertube-campaign-tier-structure.md · 494 words · 2026-04-05

PaperTube Salesforce Campaign Tier Structure

Overview

During an internal sync between Mark and Karly, the team decided to restructure PaperTube's Salesforce / Account Engagement campaign hierarchy from a vertical-based model to an ABM tier-based model. This change aligns campaign reporting with the new [1] hybrid ABM strategy and makes performance tracking more meaningful.

Previous Structure

The original campaign hierarchy was organized by industry vertical:

Asymmetric ABM (Parent)
├── Premium Food & Beverage
├── Supplements
├── Farm Style
└── [other verticals...]

Each vertical campaign contained individual account-level child campaigns. While this provided vertical-level rollups, it did not reflect the core ABM distinction that matters most: how much personalization and effort is being applied to each account.

New Structure

The restructured hierarchy organizes campaigns by ABM engagement tier:

Asymmetric ABM (Parent)
├── ABM Tier 1
├── ABM Tier 2
└── ABM Tier 3

Each account is assigned to a tier based on its priority ranking, and all campaign activity rolls up accordingly.

Tier Definitions

Tier Accounts Outreach Method Owner
Tier 1 Top ~50 Manual, personalized email + LinkedIn (copy/paste) Parag (client)
Tier 2 Next priority accounts Automated email sequences Asymmetric / Account Engagement
Tier 3 Remaining accounts Automated email sequences Asymmetric / Account Engagement

See [2] for the full strategic rationale behind this tiering approach.

Rationale for the Change

Implementation Notes

Action Items (as of meeting)

Sources

  1. Index|Papertube
  2. Hybrid Abm Model|Hybrid Abm Model
  3. Index|Papertube Client Overview
  4. Api Access Security Token|Salesforce Api Access Via Security Token
  5. Linkedin Automation Limitations|Linkedin Automation Limitations