wiki/knowledge/salesforce/quarra-permission-analysis.md · 451 words · 2026-03-19

Quarra Salesforce Permission Analysis & Recommendations

Overview

During a working session on 2026-03-19, an AI-powered permission audit was conducted on the Quorra Salesforce org. The analysis produced two documents delivered to Lincoln Durham for review prior to the next client meeting:

  1. Quorra Stone Salesforce Permissions — a full summary of the current permission setup, including profiles, permission sets, and validation rules
  2. Quorra Stone QR Permissions Recommendate — a set of AI-generated recommendations for improving the org's security posture

Both documents were saved to the shared drive under Projects > Salesforce.


Current State Summary

The permission audit pulled all permission-related data from the org via the Salesforce API, including:

The resulting document ran to approximately 11 pages.


Key Findings & Recommendations

Lincoln Durham — Admin Profile Risk

Finding: Lincoln Durham, Director of Sales, holds full System Administrator access to the Quorra org.

Risk: A System Administrator can modify metadata, delete any record, change automation, install packages, and alter field mappings org-wide. For a non-technical sales leader, this represents a significant accidental-change risk — a single errant click in Setup could break flows, validation rules, or field mappings across the entire org.

Recommendation: Downgrade Lincoln Durham from the System Administrator profile to a more appropriate profile (e.g., a Core Executive profile) that provides the data access he needs without exposing destructive Setup capabilities.

Note for client communication: Frame these as AI-generated recommendations, not team opinions. Lincoln should feel free to accept, modify, or reject any suggestion. The goal is to start a conversation about access governance, not to prescribe a specific outcome.


Inactive Users

During the audit, a test/legacy user (Jessica) was identified as still active in the org. This user should be deactivated.


Strategy for Next Meeting

The permission documents are intended as a conversation starter, not a final implementation plan. The recommended approach for the next client meeting:

  1. Walk Lincoln Durham through both documents together
  2. Ask him to indicate what he wants to keep, change, or add for each user/role
  3. Record the meeting with [2] to capture all decisions
  4. Feed the Fathom transcript to [3] to automate implementation of the agreed-upon permission set changes via the Salesforce API

This approach avoids manual note-taking errors and allows the AI to handle the bulk of the implementation work directly from the client's stated requirements.


Sources

  1. Index
  2. Fathom
  3. Claude
  4. 2026 03 19 Quorra Prep Eydn Kickoff
  5. Field Level Security Troubleshooting
  6. Compact Layouts