wiki/clients/current/didion/2026-04-05-masa-arepa-email-landing-page-recruitment-ads.md Layer 2 article Client: Didion Milling 999 words Updated: 2026-04-05
↓ MD ↓ PDF
client-didion email-marketing landing-page recruitment meta-ads google-ads linkedin constant-contact masa-arepa campaign-performance

Masa Arepa Email, Landing Page, and Recruitment Ads Review — 2026-04-05

Overview

Working session between Melissa Cusumano (Asymmetric) and Diana Henry (Didion) covering four areas: Masa Arepa email campaign simplification, landing page overhaul, social media graphic feedback, and a Meta vs. Google recruitment ad performance analysis with a proposed budget reallocation.

Attendees:
- Diana Henry — Didion (dhenry@didioninc.com)
- Melissa Cusumano — Asymmetric (melissa.cusumano@asymmetric.pro)


Key Decisions


Action Items

Asymmetric (Due: Monday)

Asymmetric (No hard deadline)

Diana Henry (Due: EOD Thursday)


Topic Detail

Masa Arepa Email Campaigns

Current drafts are too long and risk low engagement. The agreed approach:

Masa Arepa Landing Page

The page has significant usability and content issues that must be resolved before Diana can present it to senior leadership. Required fixes:

Issue Fix
Excessive scrolling on desktop Reduce image sizes (especially large circle images) and compress white space between sections
Inconsistent body copy font size Standardize font size across all body copy blocks
Watermarked FPO images in hero carousel Replace all placeholder/watermarked images with final approved photos
Key product attributes buried Move "Traditional, non-GMO, organic, custom blend" text above the photo to increase visibility
Responsiveness Review layout at multiple screen sizes to ensure consistency

Additional support needed:
- Diana needs a tutorial video from Eshock on how to edit the carousel so she can make future updates independently (e.g., fixing "Arepas" pluralization)

Social Media Content

Recruitment Ad Performance

Nine-month performance summary (approx.):

Platform Spend Conversions CPA
Meta (TOFU) ~$1,500 65 applications ~$11
Meta (MoFu) Higher per conversion 35 applications Higher
Google Ads (total) ~$4,500 Lower conversion rate Higher
Total ~$6,000 299 total conversions ~$20 blended

Key finding: Meta campaigns are significantly outperforming Google Display in cost per application.

Proposed budget shift: Reallocate funds from Google Display to Meta TOFU, with a projected 60–80% increase in conversions at the same total budget.

Diana's concerns:
1. The math in the proposed budget transformation slide doesn't add up — Google Display reduction (~$250/month) doesn't account for the large percentage increases shown for Google SEM and Meta TOFU. Asymmetric to correct.
2. Meta's geographic radius (currently ~30–50 miles around Cambria, WI) may be too narrow for salaried roles, which typically draw from a wider area. Asymmetric to verify and adjust if needed before recommending the shift.

LinkedIn: Not yet in use for recruitment. Diana requested a 60–90 day LinkedIn campaign proposal targeting salaried positions, to be reviewed with the internal recruitment team.


Context & Background